Swedish House Mafia's legacy: greats or fakes?

I recently took a trip to Las Vegas to witness Electric Daisy Carnival, a festival that epitomises the U.S. dance boom at its most amplified. Despite the claims of the festival’s founder Pasquale Rotella that “moving forward, we don’t want to book the big guys,” 2012’s line-up was a “big guy” fraternity: Tiesto, Armin van Buuren, David Guetta, Afrojack, Calvin Harris and, on the first night, Steve Angello. The day before the festival, Angello sat on a panel at the EDM Biz conference with Kaskade, Above & Beyond and Richie Hawtin, and one of his throwaway comments stuck with me. It’s revealing of how the Swedish House Mafia positions itself. During a discussion about why dance music didn’t ignite commercially in America in the ’90s, Angello quipped: “DJs didn’t even have logos then.” The logo, the branding, the hype, the ‘global partnerships’: they’re as much what made the Swedish House Mafia as the music.

While Sneak’s self-serious crusade may be tiring, it’s true that the Swedish House Mafia are as much an archetypal ‘house’ name as David Guetta is. Both acts specialise in a kind of trance-on-steroids custom-built for mainstages – what Fatboy Slim calls the combination of “European pads and a big American fuck-off chorus”. Perhaps the best sequence in Take One sees the Swedes going quietly stir-crazy in the studio, before coming up with the bombastic keys for One. Their itch to go bigger is palpable. “It’s just so massive,” Ingrosso laughs.

Not everyone shares their passion for the “massive” pay-offs, though. “I think their sound is very Faithless-y in a way, but a very crude and reduced kind of Faithless,” Sister Bliss remarked last year. “I think without the kind of lyrical integrity maybe, and the subtlety in the sound.” Subtle was never the game-plan.

Backlash is a bitch in dance music. Those building a case against the Swedish House Mafia got a good head-start from Take One, a 40-minute film with at least 15 solid minutes of its subjects acting like douches. UK newspaper The Guardian memorably wrote a review titled ‘This isn’t Spinal Tap, it’s Swedish House Mafia’, which revelled in all the diva behaviour on show. Ingrosso melts down at not getting his own car to drive to Ultra Music Festival, then later fumes at having to share a shuttle bus with common punters. Axwell keeps asking girls if they “wanna party?” in a faintly creepy way. Angello has gripes with most promoters featured (some justifiably). “If Take One is anything to go by, a typical Swedish House Mafia DJ set involves little more than three pot-bellied men punching the air to an electro-house version of Sweet Dreams by Eurythmics,” was how The Guardian summed it up.

Part of the trio’s mystique comes from those superstar DJ clichés. Most DJs are expected to be chameleons, crafting sets appropriate to the time-slot and party. The Swedish House Mafia is expected to be the Swedish House Mafia: champagne-spraying, Grey Goose-guzzling, hard-partying bad boys. As for the actual DJing, there’s as much a tried-and-true set-list as there is on a Coldplay tour. While Take One has the sheen of an artist-sanctioned product (it was made by EMI, after all), the reality of the superstar life often seems isolating and banal on-screen. None of the guys look that healthy, either, a fact Angello riffed on in his Guest Editor stint for inthemix. “I went to a big doctor’s check-up two weeks ago, and I was scared to death,” he wrote. “I live a very unhealthy lifestyle. You travel, you eat crap food, you go up and down in weight, you drink alcohol, you don’t sleep at night. Then, after doing that for like 12 years, you think, I just have to be dying.”

The final scene of Take One sees the trio closing out Miami’s Ultra Music Festival in 2010, the curtain falling on the mainstage as those “massive” One chords do their thing. The festival was a kind of tipping point for the Swedish House Mafia. From there, the well-oiled machine stepped up a notch. The next year in Miami, they established their Masquerade Motel event in direct competition with Ultra. Every Monday at Pacha in Ibiza was a road-block, while Wednesdays saw the DJs packing out Ushuaia Beach Club. In the summer of 2011, festival headline slots were chosen carefully: T In The Park, Tomorrowland, Electric Daisy Carnival, Sonne Mond Sterne. (On the evidence of Take One, the Swedes don’t take much joy from festivals. On the way to Mysteryland in Holland, Ingrosso seems unimpressed that everyone will be on pills, while all three find plenty to gripe about in festival production.)

Comments

www.inthemix.com.au arrow left
306406
newitt

newitt said on the 26th Jun, 2012

^But he has a point..

David Guetta

David Guetta said on the 26th Jun, 2012

Sweet I might be able to pick up some cheap unused mixers. Not to mention all those 1000 thread count white Egyptian cotton shirts they bought of Paul Van Dyk.

angy

angy said on the 26th Jun, 2012

DJ Sneak loses 10 respect points from me every time he opens his mouth to piss and moan about SHM. King Unique was absolutely on the money. Axwell and co took dance music to a massive audience. How dare they! Whether people realise it or not, their impact is already trickling through to the underground, I have zero doubt about that.

cheechvda

cheechvda said on the 26th Jun, 2012

Electronic music is slowly turning into the WWE. Nice write up!

Bumpy

Bumpy said on the 26th Jun, 2012

I'm hoping this means we'll see more of Axwell oldschool style come back!

Ben Royal

Ben Royal said on the 26th Jun, 2012

More articles like this and less articles about Paris Hilton pls.

sarahanne

sarahanne said on the 26th Jun, 2012

Mad read. Nice work JackT!

xtigga

xtigga said on the 26th Jun, 2012

I really hope that all three can go back to making the music they used to make around 2005, but I've got a feeling that isn't likely.

i_have_ADD

i_have_ADD said on the 26th Jun, 2012

such a great and well articulated summary of the whole icky mess

mlirosi

mlirosi said on the 26th Jun, 2012

nailed it here, "their studio handiwork extends beyond what you see on Discogs" they wont be remebered for their music genius but they will be be remembered

fivegrand

fivegrand said on the 26th Jun, 2012

Why should we be impressed with how big the audience is if the music sucks? Jim Jones brought poisoned Kool-Aid to a big audience; it doesn't make him worthy. Sneak could be more gracious, but he's just saying what's on a lot of people's minds. (And if he didn't, then maybe you guys would be accusing all Americans of trying to ruin dance music.) House is not just any old "dance music" - you can't just play anything at 125 BPM and call it house. Like hip hop, it's also an important grassroots social movement that has to do with peace and love, creative freedom and breaking down the barriers of racism. Go and read the history of the Paradise Garage and the early days of Chicago house. The stuff these people churn out is NOT house, in fact it's kind of anti-house - it's part of a consumerist society of interchangeable cheap thrills that fans of house are working against. The stuff sounds like it belongs in a strip club or an energy-drink commercial. Seriously, it sounds like a dystopian science-fiction version of what dance music is in a fascist society with no soul. If they called it Swedish Pop Mafia, which is what it is, then we could all ignore it and get back to business.

fivegrand

fivegrand said on the 26th Jun, 2012

Or put it this way: say someone came along and called themselves something like Belgian Punk Mafia, only their music was the most generic, sold-out corporate rock possible, something like Nickelback (which is what SHM is for dance music anyway). And they made millions with it, and filled up stadiums, and people said, "At last punk has come of age." The people who lived and died for the *real* punk and all it stood for (which is far more than noise coming out of a speaker, get it?) could either keep silent, or say something about it to educate the young people who don't know any better, and thus risk getting labelled humourless geezers. But there's no way they wouldn't be angry either way. It's kind of lose-lose.

mlirosi

mlirosi said on the 26th Jun, 2012

@5k..SHM are not holding any claims of producing genre moving, ground breaking records, they produce pop music that can be loosely tied with EDM, its why people liked them. You never heard steve, seb or axwell compare themselves with carl craig or st germain (or any ties with a rich history the genere brings) they were there to make people raise their hands and they did it well

Codi

Codi said on the 26th Jun, 2012

DJ Sneak is a tool to complain about what genre of music someone is producing. If he really cared about "real" house music, he wouldn't bitch and moan over something so petty as a genre.

412nv

412nv said on the 26th Jun, 2012

Fivegrand maybe you should go cuddle up to Dj Sneak and you to can cry about how SHM "ruined house music" IMO fix my sink ruined house music LOL. fact is they will be missed by alot of people. They were 3 guys that knew how to put on a show. I loved some of their songs and im glad i caught them at future As @mlirosi said, they never compared themselves to a house DJ, they didnt even come up with the name, it came to them and they ran with it, who wouldn't.

412nv

412nv said on the 26th Jun, 2012

Also Sweet article, loving ITM as of late.

JackT

JackT said on the 26th Jun, 2012

The punk comparison is interesting...fivegrand has a good angle.

special ed

special ed said on the 26th Jun, 2012

SHM are what they are. and tall poppy syndrome is as prevalent as its ever been. they make throw away dance music for a generation with small attention spans. the problem is people get very precious about music (which is a good thing) and find it hard to accept when people become successful by watering down something into easily digestible fodder.
I personally think the music SHM make is rubbish, but millions of people around the world will disagree with me, and thats fine.
I think if people spent as much time focusing on what is important to them in music, as they do complaining about what is not, then we would have a much healthier "underground" scene.

misterg

misterg said on the 26th Jun, 2012

It should be noted that they didn't give themselves the name Swedish House Mafia, it more or less evolved after Pete Tong used the term as a way of describing the 3 of them. I wonder what might have happened if Pete simply called them the Swedish Mafia. Would so many people be bitching about what style of music they push?

JackT

JackT said on the 26th Jun, 2012

^^^ Good point actually, Steve Angello talks about that in the recent feature we put up, 'How big can dance get?'

fivegrand

fivegrand said on the 26th Jun, 2012

Hmmm, I wasn't trying to "bitch" or trash someone else's good time, so peace. I've done a lot better job than Sneak has at totally ignoring this pop stuff - when this controversy broke out a while back I had to look SHM up to see who they were. I was just trying to explain A) why Sneak has a right to be upset about use of the term 'house', which is very personal to his generation and B) why I fail to be automatically impressed with anyone just because they're massive in certain circles. Mind you when I first got into the scene way back in the day I was into some pretty daggy Belgian rave music, along with stuff like the Prodigy that I would consider pretty mainstream now, so I totally understand why kids like certain sounds before they get deeper.

fivegrand

fivegrand said on the 26th Jun, 2012

And you're probably right, the terminology probably doesn't matter. When rock 'n roll first came out in the early 50s it was really revolutionary and the word meant something. Now it means nothing - little girls wear sparkly pink T-shirts that say 'Rockstar'. So I'm sure that's happening with house - it's just happening sooner. The underground will go on, maybe under a different name.

SANDSLASH

SANDSLASH said on the 27th Jun, 2012

WE SAW, WE CAME, WE WIPED UP.

SANDSHREW

SANDSHREW said on the 27th Jun, 2012

I NEED TO WRITE IN MY FEELINGS JOURNAL

taylor williams

taylor williams said on the 27th Jun, 2012

fivegrand is 100% on the money with this one (pardon the pun) and I can understand why DJ Sneak is annoyed. He was obviously a big fan of Chicago house and then himself became a legend within the genre and felt it very important its roots and legacy be honored. So when a few chancers come along and basically dirty up its name he's not happy with it.

I play house/techno and DJ'd a party a few weeks ago, a girl asked me if I had any house music while I was playing Marshall Jefferson - Move Your Body. When I said this is house, she rephrased, do you have any David Guetta or Pitbull. Now obviously she just had very bad taste in music but this is whats getting labelled as house these days and this is why Sneak is mad.

JackT

JackT said on the 27th Jun, 2012

taylor williams, that's quite a story, haha. Woah.

Timmac

Timmac said on the 27th Jun, 2012

Marshall Jefferson - Godfather of House. Nice write up, Jack.

twistedbydesign

twistedbydesign said on the 27th Jun, 2012

That vid from the house party is pretty funny after the 'take our lives' comment.

Wouldz

Wouldz said on the 27th Jun, 2012

@mistert @JackT Their name would have little bearing on the way I perceive them if they hadn't used that name to create the brand and image that they spoke about themselves in the documentary. My issue with it is that it has generalised and dumbed down the house genre for the kids that are getting into EDM now.

My fear is if you look at the artists on the fore-front of the EDM scene (in terms of mainstream popularity) now like David Guetta, Skrillex & SHM they all grew up with their influences being in the real infant stages of the scene (maybe not so much Skrillex). Fast-forward to today and think of this current generation of kids growing up seeing EDM become massive and seeing these flashy productions with thousands of people going crazy for a set that's poorly mixed (if mixed at all) and features songs using a few repetitive, unoriginal chords.

What hope does the EDM culture have in 20 years if that's what the masses consider DJ'ing these days?

It's not about beat-matching, that's not the issue that needs to be brought up here with pre-mixed sets. The issue (for me anyway) is that these big artists are dumbing down the art of DJ'ing by going against what DJ'ing should be in essence which is choosing tracks to create an atmosphere for the audience or crowd.

These guys are what is killing our club scene in Australia. You spin for two hours on a Friday or Saturday night and you're considered a bad DJ by the punters if you don't play the flavour of the moment tracks from these commercial sell-outs. So the DJ's that want to create a mood or play new music then get snubbed by promoters and club owners when they can get someone else in who will play all the Party Rock Anthem/Sexy Bitch mash-ups the drunk WOOOOO girls can handle.

Wouldz

Wouldz said on the 27th Jun, 2012

Oh and this is just going to leave the door open for "REUNION SHOWS" at twice the booking price and half the schedule strain in 10 years time.

Swedish House Mafia is probably Axwell, Ingrosso and Angello's retirement pension.

jengkay

jengkay said on the 27th Jun, 2012

for me Dutch and Swedish DJ are the best in the world. they never fail to kill me. hahaha

damdamodam

damdamodam said on the 28th Jun, 2012

SHM are entertainers. Create the product & bring it to the people.. Some people start on the music side, some people start on the business side.. for most people music is a hobby first & a career 2nd. Most people don't have a sustainable long career at the top of the field. Can't blame them for wanting to aim high & go large. People will vote with their feet based on whats on offer. If everyone starts playing the same music (aka how it feels a little at the moment) then the future will belong to the innovators.

Original_Beats

Original_Beats said on the 29th Jun, 2012

...and that's not house , or maybe you could call it crap house

Original_Beats

Original_Beats said on the 29th Jun, 2012

...and that's not house , or maybe you could call it crap house

justo87

justo87 said on the 29th Jun, 2012

They did what they did, and they did it extreemely well... unfortunatley what they did was make super crappy, boring music...

SoulGroove

SoulGroove said on the 30th Jun, 2012

Fake or great?? ... I say they're instant cakes!!

DMC76

DMC76 said on the 1st Jul, 2012

Is it just me but I never really considered their name to be anything to do with the music they created I always thought it was just a name much like Daft Punk doesn't actually play punk music

ArmySniperDan

ArmySniperDan said on the 1st Sep, 2012

nothing House about this group, seeing as their music is played on top 40 stastions