View Full Version : CDJ400 vs CDJ800
Simon_Murphy
17-Apr-09, 08:24am
Background - have been using my mate's 200's at home just to listen to tunes etc (obviously not accurate enough to record with) and borrowing another mate's 1000's when recording mixes etc. Need to get my own cos I can't keep borrowing others' equipment.
I've read some of the discussions about the different CDJ's etc. 1000's are the obvious preference but can't wait and save any more so they're out already.
The 800's have come down a lot in price obviously and can prob pick up two new 800's for a similar price to two new 400's. I have used both but not enough time to have a preference.
Besides what is on the spec sheets what are people's thoughts and experiences on which would be better to buy for home mixing and recording?
i know you asked about home use, but i would go the CDJ800s purely for the fact they're very similar in look/feel to the 1000s, which will really help when you play out
(as most places have 1000s and the 800s will feel very similar, so you won't spend half your set getting used to them).
Random_Kiwi
17-Apr-09, 08:55am
CDJ800s purely for the fact they're very similar in look/feel to the 1000s
Look, yes..."feel", no fucking way they do...that's like saying a Porsche 911 has the same "feel" as a VW Bettle
And I've seen LOADS of smaller bars/clubs with CDJ400s in them already...more than any small bar/club that has 1000's.
They're cheaper, they take up way less space, they have more features (than the 800), they feel just as robust as the 800's, a lil plasticy compared to the 1000's, but even the 800's feel plasticy compared to the 1000's.
I freaking LOVE the 400's...the platter is a lil small, but if you're used to 200's, it's still a step up. For me, if money and space wasn't an issue, 1000's all the way...if it was an issue, 400's over the 800's anyday. The USB option, the built in effects, more variety with the pitch control percentages....0.02% increments FTW!
You've had enough practice on the 1000's not to freak out and not be able to play on them in a club when you play out, so no stress there...just comes down to which you'd prefer now...the big and clunky 800, or and compact and racey 400...
seanious
17-Apr-09, 09:22am
Look, yes..."feel", no fucking way they do...that's like saying a Porsche 911 has the same "feel" as a VW Bettle
And I've seen LOADS of smaller bars/clubs with CDJ400s in them already...more than any small bar/club that has 1000's.
They're cheaper, they take up way less space, they have more features (than the 800), they feel just as robust as the 800's, a lil plasticy compared to the 1000's, but even the 800's feel plasticy compared to the 1000's.
I freaking LOVE the 400's...the platter is a lil small, but if you're used to 200's, it's still a step up. For me, if money and space wasn't an issue, 1000's all the way...if it was an issue, 400's over the 800's anyday. The USB option, the built in effects, more variety with the pitch control percentages....0.02% increments FTW!
You've had enough practice on the 1000's not to freak out and not be able to play on them in a club when you play out, so no stress there...just comes down to which you'd prefer now...the big and clunky 800, or and compact and racey 400...
Shit now i want one :corey:
GreenyG
17-Apr-09, 09:27am
400's ftw.
I've had mine for a year now, and even if I could afford 1000's, Id still keep the 400's around for the convenience of the USB and the fact that they can use the one usb connection to your computer to work as a sound card and a midi controller. Just means that if you ever decide to get traktor (for example) up and running with it, you wont need any of the extra features of the more expensive 'scratch' version, and would be able to buy the considerably cheaper versions of this or similar software.
It's also fantastic being able to throw your new songs onto the USB and away you go, instead of burning a new cd.
For the simple convenience the 400's give you at home, you really can't go past them.
Dr Bones
17-Apr-09, 09:29am
i wasn't aware pioneer made such a big range of turntables, do ordinary cartridges and stylii fit on them?
brendanClay
17-Apr-09, 09:51am
have been using my mate's 200's at home just to listen to tunes etc (obviously not accurate enough to record with)
What do you mean not accurate enough?
Shifty-Sly
17-Apr-09, 09:54am
i wasn't aware pioneer made such a big range of turntables, do ordinary cartridges and stylii fit on them?
Bones is a fiunny guy
Simon_Murphy
17-Apr-09, 09:58am
The responsiveness of the platter on the 200 is nowhere near as accurate as the set up of the 1000 platter/jog wheel. When recording the more accurate the better and the 200 doesn't cut it. I know the 1000 does - I am interested to know if the 400 replicates this better than the 800.
Random_Kiwi
17-Apr-09, 10:09am
I am interested to know if the 400 replicates this better than the 800.
YES - the 800 only has 0.05% increments, the 400 has 0.02% so it's more accurate...you also have more options on the Percentage range, +/-6% as opposed to +/-10% on the 800
kasper_flip
17-Apr-09, 10:13am
400s all the way. anyone who buys 800s these days is a fool, 400s cost less, and have much better features. i use 400s at home and play on 1000s out, theres no problems with moving between the two.
can some one please think of the platter PLEASE!!!! i fucking hate small platters!!!! makes me feel like im gonna break the thing
slackas
17-Apr-09, 10:20am
the big and clunky 800, or and compact and racey 400...
Pffft clunky, your 400s arent going to make you mix better.
800s for me i like the platter size.
Up to opinion really, or if you want serato intergration 400s ftw, but if you just into mixing and like the platter size 800s ftw.
Simon_Murphy
17-Apr-09, 10:24am
Ok cool. Thanks for the info. I was leaning towards the 400's but just wanted some more feedback.
I have no trouble adjusting to 1000's at the moment so that won't be a problem.
400's will also still fit on my desk next to my 1200's (which I still prefer).
Random_Kiwi
17-Apr-09, 10:29am
Pffft clunky, your 400s arent going to make you mix better.
That could be argued as they have a more accurate pitch, 0.002%, as mentioned...so that could make you mix better...but yah, really, you still have to have the skills in the first place.
The only thing the 800's have over the 400's is platter size...which I don't personally find to be an issue at all.
Simon_Murphy - head into DJ Warehouse or DMC and have a play, see what you think in relation to your experience with the 200's and 1000's then play on the 800 too and go from there.
headhunta
17-Apr-09, 10:42am
I have a set of 800's the only thing is a wish i had 1000's and im glad i didnt buy 400's because most of the decent clubs/events will never go away from 1000's
Simon_Murphy
17-Apr-09, 10:47am
Ok so taking the platter size out of the equation and the moving back and forth between one of the above and a 1000 (which doesn't bother me at all - by the time the first track is cued up you can't even notice) the 400 is the better option in terms of features etc?
Has anyone who is used to playing on 1000's ever recorded using 400's?
I basically need to know whether I can accurately use them for recording mixes with the same control I get from the 1000's or whether it is still a big drop in terms of accuracy and quality.
headhunta
17-Apr-09, 10:52am
recording quality also comes down to your mixer and your sound card imo
Simon_Murphy
17-Apr-09, 10:57am
True - just trying to decide on the CDJs though in this case. New computer is coming in a few months.
kasper_flip
17-Apr-09, 11:08am
personally i would say if you depend so much on having the top of the line gear to record a mix you need to practice more... just my opinion though
Simon_Murphy
17-Apr-09, 12:01pm
So practice at using inferior gear to try to obtain the results as what is more easily achieved using better gear which is more similar to the gear used in clubs? I've had plenty of experience using 1000s - am just hoping to find a way that I can mix and record at home without having to save the extra $$.
Also if I depended on top of the line gear I would wait and save for the 1000s. Just after thoughts on the comparison between the two pieces of equipment in question.
Your previous post sums up pretty much my line of thought at the moment.
kasper_flip
17-Apr-09, 12:12pm
400s are great pieces of equipment, you will have no problem using them. when i was choosing cdjs i didn't even consider getting 800s, and then decided that i couldn't justify paying the extra money for 1000s, considering i still play mostly vinyl, and the extra features that 400s have. (as well as the fact i am a student and wanted to save some money.)
in the end i paid $1400 for 2 CDJ400s, and they weren't even bought at the same time. you would pay almost that for a single 1000, and the money you save can go towards some nice spiffy monitors or a new mixer.
Simon_Murphy
17-Apr-09, 12:15pm
Ok cool. Think i'm sold then. I also still prefer vinyl but need to have CDJs for recording mixes at home and trying out new tunes. Mate got his for $1500 for two - now to find a good deal myself.
kasper_flip
17-Apr-09, 12:17pm
do you live in melbourne? i got my 2nd 400 from JB Hi Fi in preston 3 weeks ago for $700. Elizabeth st JB also sell them, i got my first one from there.
I've yet to find a DJ store that will go as low as JB do.
Simon_Murphy
17-Apr-09, 12:32pm
Yep in Melbourne. Will call around then and see if I can get them for $700.
twiggy88
20-Apr-09, 03:48am
CDJ 400 is a much better deck then the 800. More affects/vynil effects, USB and IPOD ready. Its also cheaper then the 800. If i wanted a bigger Jog face i would save up for the 1000. The 400 suits me down to the ground for home use. 400 FTW!!!
Background - have been using my mate's 200's at home just to listen to tunes etc (obviously not accurate enough to record with)
Dont blame the tools, if you were any good you'd be able to lay down sweet mixes with those units.
For the last 5 years ive been using this
http://2mix.co.uk/shop2mix/images/axis2_large.jpg (http://2mix.co.uk//shop2mix/product_info.php?manufacturers_id=21&products_id=495&osCsid=d2a0141bd66899dc105753d40a3097db)
and this
http://www.mundomusical.cl/tienda/images/CDI-300-MP3.jpg
Two of the loosest units around, combined cost around 800$
Compaired to these a set of 200's would be a big upgrade but im not even thinking of getting newer ones, these do the job just fine.
brendanClay
20-Apr-09, 08:20am
I have CDJ200s and think they're fine. They even include the 0.02% pitch increment.
Whilst, I think that they may be the more difficult Pioneer CDJ to mix on, it will almost guarantee that you can mix on the other models.
I also think that the jog wheel on the CDJ400 feels quite cheap.
Vlammen
20-Apr-09, 08:33am
The responsiveness of the platter on the 200 is nowhere near as accurate as the set up of the 1000 platter/jog wheel. When recording the more accurate the better and the 200 doesn't cut it.
:lol:
Obviously your skills do not cut it - there are plenty of people out there who can mix no problems on a CDJ-200. Yes the platter is not as nice as on the CDJ-1000, but it's a perfectly good CD player to be mixing with.
Go practice some more.
brendanClay
20-Apr-09, 10:09am
:lol:
Obviously your skills do not cut it - there are plenty of people out there who can mix no problems on a CDJ-200. Yes the platter is not as nice as on the CDJ-1000, but it's a perfectly good CD player to be mixing with.
Go practice some more.
I attribute the platter to the "grip" (or lack of, in this case).
The CDJ400, 800 and 1000 all have plastic platters with "grooves" for your fingers.
The CDJ200 is metal.
As I say though, if you can do it on the CDJ200, the others will be easy!
Vlammen
20-Apr-09, 10:40am
I attribute the platter to the "grip" (or lack of, in this case).
The CDJ400, 800 and 1000 all have plastic platters with "grooves" for your fingers.
The CDJ200 is metal.
As I say though, if you can do it on the CDJ200, the others will be easy!
It's plastic actually - with a funny sort of coating on it.
And yes - I agree with the lack of grip, but you just need to be fairly gentle.
brendanClay
20-Apr-09, 11:07am
As soon as you're used to it, it's a piece of piss to mix on! ;)
Vlammen
20-Apr-09, 11:40am
Absolutely... As any of the Pio players are.
slackas
20-Apr-09, 12:02pm
My neighbour had american audios, OMG what a POS.
Made the worst noise if you tried to "scratch" on them.
LOL at pitch bend buttons, remind me of dual denon CDs
Vlammen
20-Apr-09, 12:04pm
All the Denon tabletops have pitch bend buttons too ;)
kasper_flip
20-Apr-09, 02:17pm
the pitch bend buttons actually arent too bad. especially when u are using DNS1000s which seem to have a delay between when you touch the platter and when there is actually any response.
pitch bend FTW!! i wish pioneers had pitch bend buttons for that extra fine tuning.
brendanClay
20-Apr-09, 04:05pm
I used my dual Omnitronic CDJ770 CD player, and my mixes were extremely tight on them! http://images04.olx.pt/ui/2/42/11/18024111_1.jpg
The fine tuning is certainly an advantage! :)
quantum8
20-Apr-09, 05:48pm
Dont blame the tools, if you were any good you'd be able to lay down sweet mixes with those units.
For the last 5 years ive been using this
http://2mix.co.uk/shop2mix/images/axis2_large.jpg
and this
http://www.mundomusical.cl/tienda/images/CDI-300-MP3.jpg
Two of the loosest units around, combined cost around 800$
Compaired to these a set of 200's would be a big upgrade but im not even thinking of getting newer ones, these do the job just fine.
i had to play on a pair of these the other week....they were a loads better than the stanton cd players :lol:
Matty_neal
20-Apr-09, 07:39pm
Man I learned to mix on Stanton C314's and my mate STILL uses them. Been going strong for two years now. Plays out on 1000's. It takes like 10 mins to get used to the 1000's after using a little dodgey platter.
I'm now convinced on getting a 400 :P
I only have one cdj and two turntables. Almost wishing I bought two cdj400's instead of one 1000...
southern_dan
21-Apr-09, 08:07pm
i love my 400's
awesome little unit, never used the effects tho, they all seem a little tinny.
looping is great on them tho.
i had to play on a pair of these the other week....they were a loads better than the stanton cd players :lol:
Yikes!!
Simon - go the 400s. As already outlined, they're more feature packed and cheaper.
Overall i think the only deciding factor is whether you would prefer a larger platter or not - and unless your going to be scratching on them, i cant see you making much use of the 800s platter size to justify going with them.
I think overall the 400s would really suit the music that you play and i dont think you'll have much problems in regards to the pitch adjust when recording. Im sure that jumping from a 1000 will take a little adjustment, but nothing a few hours of practice wont fix :)
jakeWilliams
07-Jan-10, 10:54am
does anyone think the next player popping up in clubs could be the 900? if this was the case, 400's are similar to what you may find in clubs in the near future
800's are more similar to 1000's, but 400's are more similar to 900's imo
slackas
07-Jan-10, 11:02am
does anyone think the next player popping up in clubs could be the 900? if this was the case, 400's are similar to what you may find in clubs in the near future
800's are more similar to 1000's, but 400's are more similar to 900's imo
In features... yes... in feel and general use.... no
DastardlyD
07-Jan-10, 01:04pm
http://2mix.co.uk/shop2mix/images/axis2_large.jpg (http://2mix.co.uk//shop2mix/product_info.php?manufacturers_id=21&products_id=495&osCsid=d2a0141bd66899dc105753d40a3097db)
im not even thinking of getting newer ones, these do the job just fine.
I just sold my axis 4 but i still have my axis 8 version which has stood the test of time for almost 4 years with plenty of gigs under it's belt. I like that it's sturdy and compact, essential when im also lugging my 1200's.
CDJ 400 is a much better deck then the 800. More affects/vynil effects, USB and IPOD ready. Its also cheaper then the 800. If i wanted a bigger Jog face i would save up for the 1000. The 400 suits me down to the ground for home use. 400 FTW!!!
What he said.
wheelo007
07-Jan-10, 04:05pm
I think the moral of the story is everybody has different tastes. Shit man, just get one of each if you can't decide and then you'll be a master of everything. Otherwise just hit a store and try both and see what feels nice and fuzzy under your fingers.
I bought a set of ex rental 1000s for $800 each. Perfect condition with a 1 year warranty from DJwarehouse. So bargain's do come up every once in a while.
inafets
09-Jan-10, 01:28pm
The platers in CDJ-800s are better, they are more precise.
deejaydee
09-Jan-10, 11:44pm
The platers in CDJ-800s are better, they are more precise.
You either nudge it forward/back, or you don't... Explain? :rainman:
PS. Wanna scratch? Try a different media
jakeWilliams
10-Jan-10, 11:51am
http://sonyalynn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nails-on-chalkboard1.jpg
deejaydee
10-Jan-10, 02:15pm
^
:thumb:
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.