Quote:
Originally Posted by moskate
Speaking of deals this off season, I'm sick of hearing about players wanting more money & threatening holdouts when they still have multiple years left on their deals. Maybe we are spoilt here in Australia as the thought of a Benji Marshall or Chris Judd not turning up to off season practice coz he wants more money is so foreign to our sporting landscape but it just seems greedy to me. I'm talking mostly about MJD at this point but lots of players do it. Derrell Revis seems to be a serial offender. Bloke holds out till he gets his big front loaded contract only 2 years ago then whinges & threatens a holdout when the significantly poorer backend of the deal comes into effect.
How many players have either been arrested, stabbed or pushed their mothers this off season.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zealbee
Yeah I agree with all your points. I thought Brees, although being a great player and the heart of the team, came off as greedy as fuck through the entire negotiation and his salary is ridiculous. I think players somehow get it in their heads that they couldn't survive if they only earnt say 5 million a year instead of 6. Ridiculous and out of touch with reality imo.
I agree with both of you but I guess the money and scale of sport in America has a different effect on the way players do business (lets not forget that this is a business).
In regards to Revis, his last deal was widely known by all as a patch up deal that was put together in a bid to get him on the field in time for the start of the season. There was little doubt from the team, Revis and the public that the contract would have to be reassessed in due time. Like with Brees (who I'll get to in a second), it has a lot to do with principal and perspective. Revis is the best corner in the game and won't be earning money that reflects that from this season onwards. No matter how much you enjoy your job, would you honestly give your best performance once you essentially take a pay cut? Sure, both guys already have money pouring out their ears. But it is a business, and the best should be getting paid the best.
With Brees, there were several issues that people need to remember with his situation. He did come off looking like a bit of a chump, but in fairness it's safe to say that he's probably one of the most genuine players in the game. Drew's issue had more to do with the length of the contract as I understand it, and yes he had an issue with being franchise tagged again, but with good reason. Firstly, the percentage of which the Saints were looking to tag him didn't match up with what it should actually be based on whatever numerical system they use to scale the value of that specific player. It might mean nothing to a lot of us whether we forfeit a couple of hundred thousand dollars here or there if we were being offered a multi-million dollar contract (hell, I'd donate a kidney), but it's still all relative. You wouldn't let your employer try and low ball you. It's not how you do business. BUT more importantly, Drew Brees is all too familiar with the curse of the franchise tag. It cost him his job in San Diego due to a season ending injury that saw Philip Rivers become the unquestioned starter.