The Guardian UK asks: Is Skrillex the most hated man in dubstep?

www.inthemix.com.au
  • 42
  • 2
  • 1938

Imagine for a moment you’re Skrillex. You spend countless hours in hotel rooms and transit lounges, eat a lot of dinners with promoters desperate to please, get chauffeured into clubs bursting at the seams with rowdy kids, drink a lot of Jack Daniel’s and Diet Coke, and generally have a fun time with it. After all, you’re not yet 25, so what’s not to be content about?

Interviews aren’t your favourite thing to do, but you do them diligently. You’re in London and the esteemed Guardian newspaper wants to profile you, so of course, why not? You give an interview in which you’re described as “relaxed”, “lucid” and “full of the joys of life”, which sounds about right. Then your manager sends you the article – they’ve given it prime position in the Culture section. The title: ‘Is Skrillex the most hated man in dubstep?’ We’ll forgive you for feeling kind of pissy about that.

Few dance music personalities incite the kind of firestorm of opinions that Skrillex does. Whether he’s working with motion-capture robots on a live show or teaming up with nu-metal relics Korn, it’s sure to be divisive. In the Guardian interview – which you can read in full here – he claims not to hear the haters.

“I never really even hear these views, mainly because I don’t have much time for the internet,” he tells the paper. “I go to shows and all I see is love. I didn’t even know people had an issue until someone said: ‘Oh, this and that forum seem to have a real problem with you.’”

And before you start accusing him of defiling dubstep, it turns out the term irks him. “I don’t even try to make ‘dubstep’,” he says, ‘lifting his hands to make air quotes’ at The Guardian writer. “It’s just another tempo and rhythm that I work in, because it makes people go wild.”

The interview also finds Skrillex discussing his legitimate reasons for being “emo” as a teenager, why he can’t sign up to a “cocaine lifestyle”, and the insatiable appetite around the US for what he does. It all signs off with the line, “Is it any wonder he’s happy?” That article title might dent his mood.

Social

  • joannageorgiou
  • system_

Comments

www.inthemix.com.au arrow left
297387
DJ KnightSA

DJ KnightSA said on the 11th Oct, 2011

I was going to come in and embarrass all the Skrillex White Knights, but they all seem to have done a good enough job of that as is.

Token defenses already done: "If you don't like it, don't listen to it", "Lot's of people like him - so you must be wrong", "If you spent enough energy hating than you do on something else then you'd be successful like him". Christ, it's like you're all as predictable and 2D as his music.

Okay, well, sure those arguments are as applicable to Skrillex as the are to Bieber.
Not saying that anything I said in relation to that was my brightest shining moment of literary achievement.

However, the counter arguments aren't exactly creative either: "His music is predictable and 2D" (Sure; but, really, so is 99.99% of dance music in all genres to anyone with even an inkling of an understanding of music theory) "It's unoriginal and not creative" (This one irks me because I honestly can't see how what he did with dubstep was anything but) "His fans clearly have no taste" (Which, to everyone with even a mediocre understanding of argumentative language should read "His fans clearly don't have my taste")

The only arguments I can really accept are the purists. Even they should appreciate Skrillex though. If it weren't for him, dubstep would be nowhere near as big as it is now and thanks to him, the "pure" dubstep they love so much now has a far greater chance of being heard and appreciated by others. And it's not like you can call me some uneducated kid on the matter as I've been listening to dubstep since '09.

For those who are simply against Skrillex without the love of dubstep behind their arguments, imagine someone saying negative things about your favourite artists. Your automatic assumption would be that:
1. They're wrong
2. The only reason that they are making negative comments is that they don't understand/appreciate what makes that artist good.
Hopefully, you realise that everytime you post something negative about Skrillex, you are causing both of these arguments to ring true in my head. In order for you to have ANY chance of making a valid point about why Skrillex isn't good, you MUST understand and appreciate why others think that he is.

For those arguing that it's because people think he's hardcore, it's not. It's because he's musically energetic, to the point of coming across as eclectic and scattered. His randomness and distortion, however, are both highly controlled in the end he achieves the result his audience is looking for. He also gets his audience way better than most artists on the scene because he's still in his early 20's. He knows they want that insane, mosh-tasic vibe to their music because he want's that too. In that way, he's staying true to himself and his fans, all in one go.

TL;DR: Music is about an individual's taste and personal opinions. Try and understand another person's before you tell them that their's is wrong. If you knew why Skrillex's fans liked him, you'd probably be content to leave him alone (y'know, like the rest of the world seems pretty damn happy about doing).